|
|
Post by Brigid Briton on Mar 21, 2011 18:06:22 GMT -6
This is an altered photo of a collage I made 10 years or so ago. |
|
|
|
Post by Fire Monkey on Mar 21, 2011 19:23:03 GMT -6
So, if I understand this, you made a collage 10 ears ago and then took a photo of it which you then altered - is that right? If so, I'd say this is both the art of the collage and the art of the photo/alteration. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Brigid Briton on Mar 22, 2011 8:54:03 GMT -6
Yes, Tim, you're right. It's both original art and an altered photo. However, since the original image (the collage) was changed into something else (the altered photo), I consider it to be more in the latter category. (A regular photo of a piece of art would not be in this category). One of the things I love about altering photos is that you can completely change the colors and other effects in an infinite number of ways. It's very therapeutic puttering around with so-called reality in this way.  Brigid |
|
|
|
Post by Callisse J. DeTerre on Mar 26, 2011 22:14:12 GMT -6
Brigid, agree - that's what I love about the art form. This image looks like a background image for an event's poster ad.
|
|
